I was for a very long time a faithful user of GNU screen.
That has mellowed somewhat over the past few years, partly because tmux — I must admit — is leaps and bounds beyond what screen can do, but also just because there are other options too.
Things like dvtm, or even twin, which both handle the concept of multiple-terminals-one-screen in their own fashion.
Any of those three can do … somewhat something similar to what screen does, and have probably all seen more improvements over the years than screen.
I hold no one responsible for screen’s slow spiral into staleness; in fact, if anything, that makes screen quite easy to figure out: There is plenty of discussion about screen and how it works … even if some of it isn’t flattering. ๐ฏ
It may be the ugly stepmother of terminal multiplexers, but you can’t deny that it does what it claims. And in the realm of console-based software, that alone is sometimes enough to get by. In my book, anyway. ๐
Postscript, 2014-04-20: Wouldn’t you know it, only a day after whining about years without updates, this trickles down the pipe to my lowly Arch install.
You could knock me over with a feather. ๐ฏ Ask and ye shall receive, apparently. ๐
Pingback: Links 19/4/2014: | Techrights
Pingback: scrollz: Fast, friendly and light | Inconsolation
Yes, GNU screen is alive, again.
Screen has new principal maintainer ( http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00000.html ), with energy and plans to integrate new patches in GNU screen main line.
Announce of 4.2.0 in, with plans to future 5.x development, can be read in http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/screen-devel/2014-04/msg00024.html
Pingback: splitvt: Under the most dire of circumstances | Inconsolation
Pingback: neercs: Compiz at the console | Inconsolation
Pingback: conspy: Take command of your command line | Inconsolation
Pingback: whowatch: Don’t just take my word for it | Inconsolation
Pingback: undistract-me: Quashing your ADHD | Inconsolation
Pingback: undistract-me: Quashing your ADHD | Linux Admins